After a difficult season whereby ?Crystal Palace barely secured their Premier League survival, French defender Mamadou Sakho has urged the club to sign sign one of their standout players from the previous campaign on a permanent deal.
The former Liverpool defender has put the onus on the Eagles bosses to secure a deal for ?Chelsea loanee Ruben Loftus-Cheek after a fantastic 2017/18 campaign saw him notch two goals and three assists, as well as securing a call-up to England’s World Cup squad.
The 22-year-old midfielder put in a series of excellent performances for Roy Hodgson’s Palace side before returning to his parent club, Chelsea, at the end of the season.
Now, with Palace facing the task of building upon their mid-table finish for next season, Sakho believes Loftus-Cheek should be brought back to Selhurst Park, as reported by ?talkSPORT.
“I would say yes. Ruben is really talented and has a lot of quality,” Sakho explained.
“His season was a little bit difficult for him as he had a long-term injury but when he came back we saw the difference that he can make on the pitch.
“So yes I think that it can be a really good deal for the club. You have a few people in the club that are trying to make the best choice about the players and to have a good squad next year.”
After managing to secure their Premier League status for yet another year, Palace will be keen to keep hold of their standout performers this season.
However, as well as potentially losing Loftus-Cheek, ?the Eagles may also be without their talisman Wilfried Zaha for the 2018/19 campaign, with the Ivorian international keen to play European football.
There was an intriguing development in the Alvara Morata saga on Wednesday, as the ?Chelsea striker was photographed with his agent and ?Juventus director Fabio Paratici – but not in Juve’s home city of Turin.
As shown by a tweet from Transfer News Live, Morata was seen in ?Milan. I Rossoneri have reportedly held talks with Chelsea about the possibility of signing him, ?according to the Daily Mail. So the Spain striker was with a representative of ?a club reportedly interested in him – and where he played for two seasons from 2014 to 2016 – in another likely suitor’s home city.
Whatever it means, this photo isn’t likely to dampen speculation about Morata’s future, as it looks increasingly unlikely that he will remain at Stamford Bridge. However, according to ?Sky Italia, no discussions regarding a potential move took place during the chance meeting.
Although his Premier League tally of 11 goals in 31 appearances seems respectable by most standards – and isn’t vastly worse than his record of 15 league goals in 26 games for ?Real Madrid in the 2016/17 season – Morata’s performances for Chelsea are still regarded as a major disappointment by many Blues fans, who no doubt expected more goals for a club record fee of £60m.
Morata’s frustrating season went from bad to worse when Olivier Giroud moved from ?Arsenal to Stamford Bridge in the January transfer window. It seemed to confirm that the club had lost confidence in the Spaniard’s ability to lead the line.
In fact, Giroud’s relatively modest goalscoring record since leaving the Gunners may be even more galling for Morata – the Frenchman has made 18 appearances for the Blues but has found the net just five times.
To cap what has been a miserable season for the Spain striker, ?he was left out of his country’s squad for this summer’s FIFA World Cup in Russia. Wherever he plays next season, Morata will surely hope that it’s a significant improvement on the last one.
After spending three seasons with ?Bayern Munich, Chile’s Arturo Vidal is reportedly looking for a new challenge away from the Bavarian club, and has been ?heavily linked with a switch to the Premier League.
The 31-year-old midfielder is widely anticipated to leave Bayern Munich this summer, after having won the ?Bundesliga for third time with Die Bayern, ?although the former ?Juventus man will be slightly disheartened by Chile’s failure to qualify for the World Cup, as well as sustaining a knee injury in April.
In recent years, Vidal has been heavily tipped to join ?Chelsea should he choose to come to the Premier League, not least due to the positive relationship he established with Blues boss Antonio Conte throughout their time in Turin together.
However, with Conte widely tipped to leave Chelsea this summer, as well as the Blues failing to secure qualification to the Champions League, Vidal is reportedly no longer interesting in making the switch to London, as reported by Chilean journalist Maks Cárdenas.
FC Bayern ready to sell Arturo Vidal for 50m ? (he has one more year contract, tomorrow he will turn 31 and he is recovery for his second knee surgery) Chelsea not an option without Champion. Man Utd is the best fit in UK. UK or Italy probable destination. 35? can be a bargain
— Maks Cárdenas (@MaksCardenas) May 21, 2018
Instead, ?Manchester United have become the main subject of Vidal’s interest, with Bayern reportedly ready to allow the Chile midfielder leave for a fee of €50m.
??Despite Vidal still having one year remaining on his contract, he is keen to leave Bayern Munich, with the incoming Leon Goretzka expected to limit the 31-year-old’s opportunities at the Allianz Arena.
?Napoli president Aurelio De Laurentiis has officially confirmed that manager Maurizio Sarri has left the club, with the Italian now expected to join Chelsea when Antonio Conte’s departure is confirmed.
Sarri guided the Serie A club to a second placed finish in Italy’s top flight this year, though at times it looked as though the Neapolitan side may have pipped Juventus to their first Scudetto since 1990. Sarri’s brand of thrilling attacking football has won him many plaudits across Europe, with a number of top clubs taking notice.
I’d like to thank Maurizio Sarri for his valuable contribution to the Napoli cause. He brought joy and prestige to Naples and Napoli fans all over the world with an entertaining brand of football that drew praise from all quarters. Well done, Maurizio. Aurelio De Laurentiis #ADL https://t.co/dGE9WNCxFp
— Official SSC Napoli (@en_sscnapoli) May 23, 2018
Prime among those clubs is Chelsea, who are now expected to appoint Sarri as their new head coach when current boss Antonio Conte is relieved of his duties. Sarri is reported by the ?Sun to have rejected an offer of £5.2m a year from Zenit St. Petersburg this week in order to hold out for a move to Stamford Bridge.
Meanwhile, De Laurentiis was seen meeting Carlo Ancelotti this week ahead of his appointment as Sarri’s successor. It’s reported that a ?deal has been agreed between the former Milan and Real Madrid boss and the club, and that Ancelotti has signed on the dotted line for two years, at a similar pay to what Sarri has turned down in Russia.
Confirming his departure on Twitter on Wednesday, De Laurentiis tweeted: ?”I would like to thank Maurizio Sarri for his precious dedication to Calcio Napoli, which has made it possible to give prestige and emotions to the city and to the blue fans all over the world, creating a model of play admired everywhere and by anyone.
The Video Assistant Referee or VAR as it is known, is becoming an increasingly prominent fixture in football and will be used at a World Cup for the first time this year, with the tournament being hosted by Russia. The system can only be used in the cases of allowing or disallowing goals, red cards, penalties or mistaken identities.
The latest World Cup betting odds have both 2014 hosts Brazil and defending champions Germany as the joint favourites to win this year’s tournament, at a price of 9/2. They will both be hoping that VAR is effective, as in some domestic competitions it has proven to be ineffective at helping the referee to make a decision.
The World Cup has seen some appalling refereeing decisions over the years, some which have had very little impact to the overall result, whilst others have seen a team progress that should have been knocked out.
Italy vs Uruguay 2014
In what was arguably the ‘Group of Death’ at the tournament in 2014, England, Costa Rica, Uruguay and Italy were all battling it out for a place in the second round. It was Costa Rica and Uruguay who ultimately progressed, however in the final round of the group, VAR could have seen Italy through at the expense of Uruguay.
There were two incidents where Italy believed the referee was mistaken, although in hindsight only one would VAR have had an impact. The first was the sending off of Claudio Marchisio, which after seeing replays, was completely justified as the midfielder needlessly had his studs up against Egidio Arevalo.
The second incident saw Uruguayan striker Luis Suarez and Italian defender Giorgio Chiellini come together before both fell to the ground apparently in pain. Although not initially obvious, what had actually happened was that Suarez had bitten Chiellini in an off the ball incident. Suarez received no punishment for the incident and just over a minute later, Uruguay scored from a corner and went on to win the match. Had the match ended in a draw, Italy would have progressed on goal difference.
Suarez received a ban for the incident which lasted for nine international matches, suggesting that he should have received a red card during the match. A red card for Suarez would have levelled the playing field and could have changed the outcome of the match.
South Korea World Cup 2002
It was at the World Cup in 2002, hosted by South Korea and Japan, to date the only time there has been more than one host of the tournament that saw a number of controversial refereeing decisions that the use of VAR would have eradicated.
South Korea benefitted the most from these decisions, which helped them see off Italy in the second round and Spain in the quarter-final. In the game against Italy, Francesco Totti was wrongly given a second booking for supposedly diving, despite replays clearly showing contact being made between the striker and South Korean defender Song Chong-gug. Totti was one of Italy’s best players and to lose him shortly before half time in extra time was a blow to the Italians. Ahn Jung-Hwan would go on to score the golden goal in the 117th minute. The game was littered with fouls from the Koreans which went unpunished despite several being potential red card offences.
South Korea’s game against Spain was arguably even worse, with Spain denied two legitimate goals. The first was a Ruben Baraja header that was ruled out by Egyptian referee Gamal Al-Ghandour for alleged shirt pulling and pushing, despite the Spanish player seemingly being innocent of such conduct. The second came in extra time, as Fernando Morientes scored with a header from a Joaquin cross, only for the linesman to rule the goal out, believing that the ball had crossed the line for a goal kick before Joaquin put the cross in. Replays showed that this was not the case and that the goal should have stood, which would have won Spain the match via the golden goal. Instead South Korea knocked Spain out on penalties and became the first Asian team to reach the semi-finals of a World Cup.
West Germany vs France 1982
The 1982 World Cup semi-final saw West Germany take on France for the chance to play Italy in the final. Both sides had some incredible players in their team, with Germany’s squad containing European Footballer of the Year Karl-Heinz Rummenigge and France with Michel Platini, who would go on to win three Ballon d’Ors.
The most controversial moment of the match came in the 60th minute, when French defender Patrick Battiston, who was only subbed on in the 50th minute, was chasing a through ball from Platini. The West German goalkeeper, Harald Schumacher came racing out of his goal in order to prevent Battiston from getting to the ball first, however, instead of getting to the ball, he clattered into the Frenchman, knocking out his two front teeth and leaving him unconscious.
The collision occurred just inside the box, meaning France should have been awarded a penalty as well as seeing their opponents reduced to ten men. At the end of 90 minutes, the score was 1-1: had France had been given a penalty for that incident and be playing against ten men, they would have more than likely progressed to the final and could have won their very first World Cup, something that they later achieved when they hosted the tournament in 1998.
Germany vs England 2010
The second round of the 2010 World Cup saw old rivals England and Germany play each other in the tournament for the first time since the semi-finals of the 1990 World Cup. Germany took a 2-0 lead after the 32nd minute of the match before England’s Matthew Upson got a goal back five minutes later. However, it was two minutes after England got their goal that controversy struck, as Frank Lampard took a shot outside of the area, the ball hit the crossbar and clearly crossed the line before bouncing out again.
The referee ruled that the ball had not crossed the line meaning England were denied the legitimate equaliser. Germany would go on to thrash England 4-1 and who knows, if England had been allowed the goal, things may have been very different and England would have potentially become the favourites in World Cup betting tips for the remainder of the tournament.
England vs West Germany 1966
When Lampard’s goal was disallowed, it was seen by many in Germany as justice following the controversy in the 1966 World Cup final. England were the hosts and had beaten Argentina and Portugal on their way to the final. West Germany had beaten Uruguay and the Soviet Union to book their place at the old Wembley Stadium.
England were going for their first World Cup win, while West Germany, who had previously won the tournament in 1954, were looking for their second. West Germany took the lead after 12 minutes, before Geoff Hurst equalised for England six minutes later. England’s Martin Peters scored their second goal just over ten minutes later before Wolfgang Weber got a last minute equaliser to take the match into extra time.
It was in extra time that the controversial moment took place, as England’s Geoff Hurst took a shot at goal which hit the cross bar and bounced back out, however, it’s almost impossible to tell whether it went in or not. Azerbaijani linesman Tofiq Bahramov gave the goal and Geoff Hurst would add another goal to complete his hat-trick and in turn guide England to a 4-2 victory. It’s probably the only controversial moment mentioned here in which even VAR would struggle. Given how close it looks in replays, it was likely not a goal, and therefore England would not have taken the lead and Germany may well have gone on to win the game.
Argentina vs England 1986
One of the most infamous goals in World Cup history was scored in the quarter-final match between Argentina and England before being followed up just minutes later by one of the best goals ever scored.
After a first half which contained no goals, it took just six minutes after the restart for a goal to be scored, although it was to be the most controversial goal in World Cup history. Argentina legend Diego Maradona played the ball to Jorge Valdano, however the ball actually went to England’s Steve Hodge, who miscued his clearance and the ball flew back in the air towards the England goal. Maradona chased the ball while England’s goalkeeper Peter Shilton charged towards the ball in an effort to punch it clear. Maradona, who was seven inches shorter than Shilton, managed to reach the ball first, however he actually used his hand in order to score the goal.
This goal would forever be known as ‘The Hand of God’ goal, after Maradona’s post-match press conference in which he said the goal was scored “a little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God”. Five minutes after the ‘Hand of God’, came the ‘Goal of the Century’ in which Maradona collected the ball inside his own half before running towards the English goal, beating four English players and finding the back of the net. If VAR had existed, the ‘Hand of God’ goal would have been ruled out, Maradona may have been sent off, which would have denied the ‘Goal of the Century’ and against ten men England may have progressed through to the semi-final and potentially even win it.